August 08, 2007
Role Reversal Helps Solve Relationship Crisis

GUEST BLOGGER: Miriam Tan-Fabian

It's not for lack of trying - being a housewife is not for me. Coming from a moderately well-to-do background, I really didn't learn all those 'housewife-ly' chores until AFTER I got married. As far as I could remember, we always had helpers in the house, so that wasn't the most conducive condition to learn chores, especially the very physical ones. For most of my life, I lived in the city, worked for four and a half years as a research associate, had city friends, loved eating out, going to gigs, and took up some Masteral units. It was very hectic pace, but I loved it.

To say that I was culture-shocked when we moved to Olongapo is the understatement of my life. Though I never learned to like cooking and we hired a labandera to do our laundry, I made the best of the situation. I trained myself to wake up early in the morning, buy breakfast, iron my husband's clothes and learn the balancing act of simultaneously relating with my husband while eating and feeding my baby boy. When my husband would leave for work, I'd immediately wash the dishes and then my son Sil's bottles, boil them and use the boiled water for his bath, coax the baby to sleep then clean house.

This happened day-in and day-out and though we only had a tiny house, the routine got to me after awhile. It also didn't help that - except for my husband - there was never anyone to talk to. The farthest I got was talking with my mom-in-law's pastor's sister who was also from Manila, and I only got to talk to her once!

I also tried to apply for a job in Subic but was only told that I was overqualified time and time again. There didn't seem to be any kind of job fit for me. I've always wanted to hone my writing skills, but at the time, there were no local publications that catered to my writing style. I couldn't help myself from spiraling into depression. I started not to care how I looked. I began picking fights with my husband, even going as far as breaking one of his limited edition mugs. At the lowest ebb, I developed a skin condition that caused sores in my earlobes, but I did not bother to deal with it due to my depression. My husband had to force me to have my hair cut really short to help my condition.

On my husband's side, he held a relatively high-paying position, but he hated his work and the dog-eat-dog corporate mindset. He forced himself to work every day, feeling as if he betrayed his real self. To make matters worst, he worked within a politically divided company which had several syndicates inside. And to keep sane, he'd always dream of making music, and the idea of staying at home was becoming more and more attractive to him. Unlike me, he is domesticated -- loves to cook and fix things around the house.

Almost three years ago, my dad died. Being an only child, we had to move back to Laguna from Olongapo and live with my mom. We came to accept the fact that I am the career mother type and Erick is the domesticated father. I was able to go back to work while my husband stayed at home and took care of Sil. While I became the breadwinner, he has taken on occasional outsourced projects as web designer/graphic artist to augment my income. Currently, we have more plans to make sure that Erick has a continuing supply of these projects.

Needless to say, both our parents did not understand at first. Through both subtle and explicit means, they pressured Erick to take a conventional job, or even tried to convince me to pressure him. Underneath all the drama, they thought that traditionally, a man should always be the breadwinner in the family. Some of my office colleagues did not understand either. During times of financial difficulty, I sometimes get suckered into thinking the same. There is still a small part of me that feels dependent and needy for a "breadwinning man," except I know that taking care of the house and kids is a thankless, payless calling that is even more challenging than a typical 8 to 5 job.

It does get easy while we live this game called "life". While I don't want to be constantly explaining our lives, there have been times when we still have justify ourselves to the traditionalists-that-be. But I like to point out that a couple's relationship shouldn't be about stereotypical roles. It's about complementing each other; it's about playing to our strengths and minimizing weaknesses. In the end, it's all about respecting our uniqueness as persons and not being enslaved by labels.

Right now, we are more or less satisfied with our setup. I've always loved working in the academe, and I get to meet more people to network with during events and out-of-town conferences. Eventually, I also had the chance to write for a magazine and a newspaper column. (And now, this blog, too!)

Labels: , ,


April 23, 2007
The timeliness of bullying, part 2

On 'What to do if your child is bullied':

I find the suggestions of The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry close to useless if school authorities in our own academic institutions view bullying no more than a solitary experiment on toughening up oneself, with little to no regard for a 'cry for help' (see my last post). But then again, there could at least be one caring adult on campus, right? But that would depend on how much protection they can offer when it comes to giving guidance to a bullied child.

Of course, assertiveness on the part of the bullied student in encountering THE BULLY is encouraged. But it's one thing to be assertive and another to be totally lacking in supervision. Obviously, bullied kids can't do without supervision, and they should also keep in mind that it's not a sissy thing to ask for help.

Anger management issues should definitely be addressed. Ongoing bullying can leave a person angry at the world and with his/her surroundings, and I don't think it's a secret that many who have found themselves relegated to loner status have had fantasies of blowing up their high school with their classmates in it. No one's been stupid enough to pack heat just yet, so maybe they can still save themselves - just not with a noose. The sad part is that our schools don't have programs to combat bullying, nor do they offer conflict resolution or anger management training.

Also, these tips assume that children who undergo bullying can always find solace in the company of others in order to avoid contact with THE BULLY. But what if they don't have friends in school to begin with?

Other related stories on bullying and current events which affect our national psyche, also from the PDI:

RJD's first-hand account of VA Tech is actually close to home (her nephew is currently studying at VA Tech). She thinks an incident likes this can occur "anywhere where guns are so easy to get." (That means Manila, too.)

Neal Cruz views the likelihood of a school shooting to happen here as "not far off".

The United States may hold the world record for school shootings, but we hold the record for extra-judicial killings and the murders of journalists. And this year, the Philippines may set another record for election-related killings. The United States and the Philippines share a common cause for the mass murders: the ease with which people get hold of guns because they both have no effective gun control laws.

More on how guns are acquired in the Philippines (also from Neal Cruz's commentary):
Those in the Philippines who cannot legally acquire guns can get them illegally from the black market, too. There are many loose handguns, assault rifles and ammunition being sold, some by policemen and soldiers themselves. We even have a whole city engaged in the illegal manufacture of firearms. Although this is clearly illegal, the Arroyo administration doesn't do anything to stop it. On the contrary, it has made illegal gun manufacture a tourist attraction and is promoting guns as products for export.


Non-PDI-related: Sassy Lawyer waxes analytical in her context-heavy post on "the right to bear arms", and why it backfired from its intended objective.

Labels: , ,


April 20, 2007
The timeliness of bullying, part 1

The schoolyear may be over (for local schools, anyway), but earlier this week, PDI decided to run a story about the culture of bullying that takes place on campus grounds. Stranger yet is the VA Tech student massacre that had to happen like, a day later. Talk about serendipity of the worst kind.

Anyway, the article opens with the writer's personal account of her son as the unfortunate target of bullying from a higher-ranked fencing teammate, and delves into the systems that encourage (rather than discourage) bullying to continuously take place in exclusive schools. It's specifically aimed at parents - especially those who have witnessed their own child being bullied by a classmate, peer or even a group of people who look down on those who are either 'unlike' or 'don't measure up' (my quotations).

The writer also cites Dr. Honey Carandang, who tackles the psychological aspects of bullying. She manages to pack a few punches of her own by addressing the following:

a.) Bullying can be learned at home, especially if a parent, who is obviously looked onto as a role model, exhibits such tendencies. Taming the bully, however, requires a degree of intervention on the part of both parent and child.

b.) There are many faces to a bully. Apart from the stereotypical tough guy, bullies can come in groups. Because of how social hierarchies in school operate, bullies can develop status over time - so even the admirable "it" crowd is capable of bullying. And by bullying, it's not always the physical kind. Bullying can be emotional, in the form of outright rejection or ostracism.

c.) Even school authorities are complicit in allowing this culture of bullying to take place by choosing to turn a blind eye, to the point of trivializing the threat by suggesting that the bullied student should learn to fend for himself or herself.

d.) Often, students who unwillingly find themselves in this seemingly endless battlefield feel that suicide is the only way out of being bullied and ostracized. (Dr. Carandang has dealt with a number of cases.)

e.) If the schools in our country don't get their act together to address this problem by reorienting the school system, it'll get only worse. The possible approximation or alternate reality? We could be short of a Columbine blood bath, if the student decides to "hit back".

f.) Bullying can be further prevented if students were more encouraged by the schools to get hobbies or throw their passions in extra-curricular activities.

I don't always take expert opinions at face value, but it's rare that I come across those that aren't sugar-coated with forced optimism and faux Zen-like contentment. Having said that, I think it's cool that Dr. Carandang addressed this bullying problem in schools as something that is sadly overlooked in the very institutions that are supposed to educate students in the first place. It's easy to waste authoritative spit on social propriety and upbringing, but perpetual lip service isn't gonna keep those bullies at bay. And when the bullies do have their way, the last ones to know about it are precisely the ones who run the school. Or have they decided to let the bullies take over the school instead, enforcing their own stupid social hierarchies by deciding who's 'hot' or 'not', or too 'promdi' for that matter? Who actually rules the school?

It seems that parents who invest in their children's education may not really know (or even care) what their children are getting out of it. Bottomline is, they're there to learn. But whether the kids are alright is another thing. There's enough academic pressure in making the grade, but when it comes to getting along with the rest, the classroom can be a real social pressure cooker. Some kids can't penetrate existing social bonds (cliques), or don't really get by on uniqueness alone (that is, when uniqueness = perceived eccentricity, not the so-called uniqueness that gets one votes as class president). In fact, it's really easy to make someone feel left out when s/he isn't as rich or as branded or as conformist or even into the whole school spirit thang.

And of course, who really wants to come off as looking "socially inept", even to their own parents? Especially when the problem doesn't really lie with the kid enduring all sorts of emotional bullying and ostracism, but that s/he just wasn't lucky enough to find the right mix of classmates that s/he can relate with?

Granted, the article roots for the bullied child by giving it both a pro-parental intervention slant and addressing school administrations to get their heads out of their asses by coming up with necessary preventive measures (like school-wide anti-bullying programs). However, it lacks the more level-headed recourse to ingesting toxic liquids like detergent or making like the lone two-gun-toting psycho and shooting classmates at random - namely the ability to cope through the most uncalled-for rite of passage that certain students have to go through, at the risk of being marked for rejection and tagged "the social misfit" during their most crucial, coming-of-age.

I think it's important that students who feel the exclusion no matter how hard they tried to fit in should try not to let the classroom politics get to them. More than anything, they should be encouraged to focus on their own interests and social networks elsewhere, even if it means that most friendships actually take place outside of school. While school administrations have yet to realize they need to get their act together for the sake of their own students' sanity and well being, it always helps to talk to an adult - a guidance counselor or any older person, someone who is patient and understanding enough to listen and can give his/her own two cents on the matter. It may take a while to develop the nerves of steel required to tune out those shallow peeps that tried to ruin your life, but when it boils down to it, you have more pressing concerns at the moment, like taking charge of your own parasite-free life, keeping your grades afloat and, of course, graduation, your ticket out of there.

Connie Veneracion of the famous Sassy Lawyer blog, is living proof that parents know what's going on with their kids. A year ago, she recounted an incident in school where her daughter was a target of sexism. Her daughter retaliated when one of the guys laid a hand on her. The school administrator, in turn, lectured the girl about how it is improper for girls in general to fight back, not even out of self-defense. This led to a critique in the school's system, which does not offer protection to female students, let alone encourage them to protest when they have been wronged.

The right to good quality education (Article 10) is a right guaranteed by CEDAW, but with all the social traumarama going on in schools and the safety and well-being of students not 100% guaranteed, how can our Filipina students parttake of the experience of learning and knowledge that is rightfully theirs? For those harsher lessons in high school life, we're brought back to the big D: Discrimination. And it operates on many levels - classism, sexism (males to females, or even females to females), regionalism - even something as petty as brand of shoes or looks.

Labels: , , ,


March 02, 2007
Unwelcome Guests: OFWs and Dubya's Guest Worker Program

GUEST BLOGGER: Paolo Cruz (Dumpling Press)


Indi, a Filipina grad student in Denmark, recounts a lunch spent with an acquaintance from Kryrgyzstan:
Anyway, umupo na kami at nagkwentuhan kami tungkol sa kanya-kanyang bansa. Siya ang pangatlong Kyrgyz na nameet ko. Very Eurasian ang itsura niya. 10 years old siya nung nag collapse ang Soviet Union at yung main industry nila dati ay wool - kasi bawat Soviet State ay specialized kasi nga centralized.

"So what's the biggest earner for your country now?" tanong ko.

"Drugs!" sabi niya sabay tawa. "And in Philippines?" pahabol niyang tinanong.

"Workers."

[Anyway, we sat down and chatted about each other's country. She is the third Kyrgyz that I have met here. Her looks are very Eurasian. She was 10 years old when the Soviet Union collapsed and their main industry used to be wool - because each Soviet State was specialized, due to the centralized economy.

"So what's the biggest earner for your country now?", I asked.

"Drugs!" she said while laughing. "And in Philippines?" she followed up.

"Workers."]
She's right, of course. The National Statistics Office estimates that Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in North and South America alone remitted 6.4 billion Pesos in 2004. Even within the United States, on its own, there are at least 26,000 Filipina women active in the labor force ("at least", because the figure only represents those who completed all the paperwork necessary for legit employment). But let's get past these numbers and consider the human implications -- just what kinds of rights and benefits are they granted, as contractual "guest workers"?

Well, for starters, they *ought* to have access to the rights detailed in the UN Women's Convention (CEDAW): job security (even during pregnancy); maternity leave; loans, mortgages, and financial credit; and safe working conditions (including measures related to reproductive health). Except there's one huge problem: the United States is one of the States Parties that has never ratified its commitment to CEDAW. Therefore, OFWs working in the US do so at the mercy of Federal law, especially when Philippine embassies and consular offices claim to be over-burdened already.

That's just one reason why human rights advocates paid such close attention to President Bush's most recent State-of-the-Union Address, on January 24 this year. Bush announced that he would be pushing for a comprehensive reform of immigration laws, incluing a much-touted foreign "guest worker" program. Dubya regards these measures as being "without animosity" but also "without amnesty". As I understand it, this basically means that documented foreign contract workers get some of the benefits automatically recieved by ordinary American citizens, for the duration of their short-term labor contracts. This is meant as an incentive for workers to eventually sign up for legitimate citizenship (which remains a slow, labyrinthine process, post-9/11, even with all the technological efficiencies of a "First World" nation). However, as soon as a worker decides to over-stay (or "go TNT" -- tago ng tago, "always hiding"), they're on their own.

As one might guess, response to this announcement has been mixed. It's not uncommon to read articles like this one, with headlines proclaiming "FilAms cheer Bush's guest worker plan". But not everyone is uniformly pleased about the new measures. Responding to the news item linked above, Sociology professora Robyn Magalit Rodriguez comments:
ummm exactly who's cheering? recuitment agencies who profit from helping american firms import cheap filipino workers and the employers who hire them?

The main concern is that existing undocumented workers will end up being deported, or forcibly held in detention centers like the Hutto Family Residential Facility (a de facto prison for undocumented illegals), as their papers await processing within the Byzantine network of government bureaus.

But even as the debate continues in the U.S., worsening economic conditions over here ensure the growing lines of would-be OFWs outside the POEA offices. It's a hard life, one way or another -- for some, perhaps the indignities and uncertainty of H-2 "guest worker" status are more bearable than "going TNT" or enduring the poverty of our native land.
In every headline we are reminded
That this is not home for us

     Bloc Party,
     "Where Is Home?"

______________

A clip from an episode of Speak Out (produced by The Filipino Channel) discussing Bush's proposed guest worker program. Originally aired September 17, 2006:

Labels: , , ,


February 18, 2007
Trained for Servitude?

GUEST BLOGGER: Paolo Cruz (Dumpling Press)

Sass Rogando-Sasot uses a conversation with a Filipina domestic worker in Hong Kong as a jumping-off point for her smart critique of the Philippine Overseas Employment Agency's "competency training and assessment programme", which runs for two to three weeks, at a cost of PhP 10,000 - 15,000! To quote Miz Sass:
The rationale behind this programme is the tired ears of Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). Flooded by stories of Filipino maids being abused by their employers for lack of necessary skills to operate appliances and gadgets, POEA came up with this 10,000 pesos required skills: house cleaning, laundry and ironing, preparation of hot and cold meals, and provision of hot and cold food and beverage services. POEAs compassion for maids is sincere -- it comes with a price tag. HORRENDOUS.

...

Labour Department secretary Arturo Brion considers the proposal as a long-term investment for maids, giving them better protection against abuses and making them more competent. Mr Brion said this programme is "not mandatory". It doesn't take a genius to know that your papers will be processed faster if you undergo it. Hence, it's semi-compulsory.

So let's see if I understand this correctly -- have a look at Article 11(d) of the UN Women's Convention, which our government has agreed to (in theory, at least). It qualifies the following basic rights: "equal remuneration, including benefits, and to equal treatment in respect to work of equal value." So, apparently, knowing how to work modern household gizmos and provide "hot and cold food beverage services" is of equal value to not being treated like [expletive deleted] by one's employers (foreign and otherwise). Which is also of "equal value" to ten thousand pesos. Yeah, that really sounds fair to me, doesn't it?

Article 11(f) of CEDAW provides for the right "to protection of health and to safety in working conditions." Apparently, in the POEA's view, this only applies to those who can pay for it.

Labels: , , ,